|
Unisoc T770 Tanggula vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 |
|
Comparisons 27-08-2021 Detailed comparison data of Unisoc T770 Tanggula vs Unisoc Tiger T7510, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy T770 Tanggula or Tiger T7510.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT770 Tanggula | 22% |
Tiger T7510 | 17% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T770 Tanggula | 79% |
Tiger T7510 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT770 Tanggula | 20% |
Tiger T7510 | 16% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T770 Tanggula |
Tiger T7510 | Total score | 317736 | 243859 | CPU | 88970 | 68287 | GPU | 120734 | 92666 | MEM | 50842 | 39007 | UX | 57189 | 43889 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T770 Tanggula |
Tiger T7510 | Single-Core | 656 | 503 | Multi-Core | 2621 | 2012 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T770 Tanggula |
Tiger T7510 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here T770 Tanggula is 19% better than Tiger T7510 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP6 | PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 846 | 204 | # of Cores | 6 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.5 | 27.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.9 | 31.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 60.7 | 57.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.7 | 38.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 48.3 | 23.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 75.6 | 36.4 | Real Racing 3 | 121.4 | 85.8 | Sniper 3D | 78.2 | 74.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 72.6 | 103 | Mortal Kombat X | 96.4 | 82.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 84.2 | 68.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Vivi Magic | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | Ivy V510 5G | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T770 Tanggula is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T7510 is better: 5 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T770 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Tiger T7510 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|