Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula

Comparisons   31-08-2022
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 828 or T770 Tanggula.

 
MediaTek Kompanio 828
Unisoc T770 Tanggula

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Kompanio 82833% T770 Tanggula22%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Kompanio 82877% T770 Tanggula79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Kompanio 82830% T770 Tanggula20%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Kompanio 828 T770 Tanggula
Total score461679317736
CPU12926088970
GPU175433120734
MEM7387350842
UX8310057189

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Kompanio 828 T770 Tanggula
Single-Core704656
Multi-Core27862621

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Kompanio 828 T770 Tanggula
Frequency2600 MHz2500 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)7 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency21332133
Memory bandwidth2448
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.4-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Kompanio 828 is 3% better than T770 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP5Mali-G57 MP6
GPU Frequency850 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS705.5846
# of Cores56
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.226.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)41.255.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra53.960.7
Call of Duty: Mobile50.337.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)33.748.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition52.675.6
Real Racing 3106.1121.4
Sniper 3D99.278.2
Need for Speed No Limits74.372.6
Mortal Kombat X85.896.4
CSR Racing 263.384.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution32 MP108 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS24060
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
Modem5G Multi-ModeIvy V510 5G
Download speed2770 MBit/s.2700 MBit/s.
Upload speed1800 MBit/s.1500 MBit/s.
NavigationGlonass L1OF, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, QZSS L1CA+ L5GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 828 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T770 Tanggula is better: 18
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Kompanio 828 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
T770 Tanggula SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MediaTek Kompanio 828 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus


T770 Tanggula SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands