|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
|
Comparisons 08-07-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, GTA etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 or Dimensity 8300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 4 Gen 2 | 39% |
Dimensity 8300 | 74% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | 88% |
Dimensity 8300 | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 4 Gen 2 | 38% |
Dimensity 8300 | 72% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
Dimensity 8300 | Total score | 546249 | 1035505 | CPU | 152941 | 289949 | GPU | 207568 | 393482 | MEM | 87399 | 165670 | UX | 98334 | 186390 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
Dimensity 8300 | Single-Core | 852 | 1184 | Multi-Core | 2555 | 4305 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
Dimensity 8300 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 8000 millions | 8800 millions | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A710 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A714 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x1, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 7500 | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 52 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8300 is 21% better than Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 1486 | 426 | # of Cores | | 6 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 2520 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.1 | 39.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 58.8 | 122.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 54.5 | 73.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 54.3 | 67.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 45.6 | 104.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 71.1 | 151.2 | Real Racing 3 | 94.8 | 147.5 | Sniper 3D | 69.7 | 162.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 64.2 | 102.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 70.7 | 105.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 65.2 | 88.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X61 5G Modem-RF System | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 900 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | Beidou, GPS, Galileo, SBAS, GLONASS, GNSS, QZSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled | NavIC, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300 is better: 32 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Dimensity 8300 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|