|
MediaTek Helio A22 vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio A22 vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757), compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Mali-T880 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio A22 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Helio P20 (MT6757) is octa-core (Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, PassMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Helio A22 or Helio P20 (MT6757) and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio A22 | 3% |
Helio P20 (MT6757) | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio A22 | 62% |
Helio P20 (MT6757) | 50% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio A22 | 2% |
Helio P20 (MT6757) | 2% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio A22 |
Helio P20 (MT6757) | Total score | 53208 | 62314 | CPU | 14902 | 17440 | GPU | 20218 | 23679 | MEM | 8521 | 9968 | UX | 9582 | 11215 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio A22 |
Helio P20 (MT6757) | Single-Core | 137 | 161 | Multi-Core | 619 | 725 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio A22 |
Helio P20 (MT6757) | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | 8x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | LPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | 13.9 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P20 (MT6757) is 13% better than Helio A22 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio A22 has 4 more core than Helio P20 (MT6757). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-T880 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 68 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 17.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.5 | 13.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 31.4 | 22.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 27.2 | 14.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 37.7 | 10.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 56.8 | 14.7 | Real Racing 3 | 47.1 | 28.1 | Sniper 3D | 69.1 | 29.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 37.7 | 27 | Mortal Kombat X | 50.2 | 25.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 40.8 | 31.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio A22 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) is better: 18 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Helio A22 and Helio P20 (MT6757), and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio A22 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Helio P20 (MT6757) SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|