 |
Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i9-9900KS tests and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like SuperPi, AIDA64, 3DMark, Gears 5, RealBench, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, WPrime, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Blender.
And how good the processors are in games: - Fallout 76
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9900KS or Intel Core i9-13900T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900T | 66% |
Core i9-9900KS | 55% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900T is 16% better than Core i9-9900KS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900T | 63% |
Core i9-9900KS | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 111.1 | 97.7 | | Valorant | 126.3 | 111.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 70.7 | 62.2 | | Apex Legends | 118.7 | 104.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 94.7 | 83.3 | | Overwatch | 102.3 | 89.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.1 | 76.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.1 | 55.5 | | Warzone | 98.5 | 86.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 106.1 | 93.3 | | Valheim | 104.8 | 92.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900T | 188% |
Core i9-9900KS | 35% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9900KS since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 127W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 480 | 222 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5039 | 2201 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 799 | 518 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11203 | 5226 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2835 | 1284 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32236 | 12704 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | | Single-Core | 2591 | 3018 | | Multi-Core | 54945 | 19522 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | | Single-Core | 1974 | 1368 | | Multi-Core | 22682 | 9501 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | | Announcement date | January 24, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151-2 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 8 | | Threads | 32 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 127 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9900KS is 2% better than Core i9-13900T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900T has 16 more core than Core i9-9900KS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900T is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9900KS is better: 3
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900T and Intel Core i9-9900KS before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13900T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Intel Core i9-9900KS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
|
|
|
