 |
Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Core i9-12950HX |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Core i9-12950HX and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PassMark, MATLAB, Blender, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, 7zip, Furmark, RealBench, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, Blender, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12950HX or Intel Core i7-13705H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13705H | 58% |
Core i9-12950HX | 69% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12950HX is 15% better than Core i7-13705H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13705H | 57% |
Core i9-12950HX | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.4 | 105.0 | | Valorant | 115.3 | 119.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 66.8 | | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 112.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 89.5 | | Overwatch | 93.4 | 96.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 82.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 59.6 | | Warzone | 89.9 | 93.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 100.2 | | Valheim | 95.7 | 99.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13705H | 133% |
Core i9-12950HX | 120% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13705H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12950HX since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 55W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 280 | 571 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2705 | 5968 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 452 | 950 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5982 | 13264 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1532 | 3358 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17163 | 38163 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Single-Core | 1403 | 3598 | | Multi-Core | 29234 | 65436 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Single-Core | 1796 | 1991 | | Multi-Core | 13164 | 16637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | June 19, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1964 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 16 | | Threads | 20 | 24 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 55 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13705H is 2% better than Core i9-12950HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12950HX has 2 more core than Core i7-13705H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13705H is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12950HX is better: 26
Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13705H and Intel Core i9-12950HX before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13705H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i9-12950HX Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
|
|
|
