 |
Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i5-12400 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i5-12400 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Blender, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, WPrime, 3DMark, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Furmark, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12400 or Intel Core i5-13500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13500T | 60% |
Core i5-12400 | 57% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500T is 5% better than Core i5-12400. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13500T | 58% |
Core i5-12400 | 55% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 97.5 | | Valorant | 117.6 | 110.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 62.0 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 104.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 83.1 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 89.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 76.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 55.4 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 86.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 93.0 | | Valheim | 97.6 | 91.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13500T | 169% |
Core i5-12400 | 91% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-12400 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 337 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3243 | 2465 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 808 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7202 | 5598 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1829 | 1889 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 20710 | 18452 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Single-Core | 1671 | 4427 | | Multi-Core | 35293 | 25834 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Single-Core | 1782 | 1785 | | Multi-Core | 15214 | 9275 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 6 | | Threads | 20 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-12400 is 3% better than Core i5-13500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500T has 8 more core than Core i5-12400. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12400 is better: 7
Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500T and Intel Core i5-12400 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i5-12400 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
