|
Adreno 690 at 600 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 01-08-2021 Extreme benchmark examination data of Adreno 690 @ 600MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Adreno 690 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Adreno 690 @ 600MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Adreno 690 @ 600MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
Frequency | 600 MHz | 950 MHz | Cores | 0 | 2 | Shaders | 512 | 0 | Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm | Antutu v10 | 368469 | 204591 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 11569 | 7059 | | | | GFloPS | 740 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 340 MT/s | 751 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 9 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 690 @ 600MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|