Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 620 and Adreno 650.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 865 Plus is octa-core (Kryo 585 Prime) and Snapdragon 768G is octa-core (Kryo 475 Prime). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Octane V2, GFXBench, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 865 Plus or Snapdragon 768G and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 865 Plus

47%

Snapdragon 768G

25%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 865 Plus

74%

Snapdragon 768G

75%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 865 Plus

45%

Snapdragon 768G

22%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 865 Plus	Snapdragon 768G
Total score	663155	346924
CPU	185674	97134
GPU	251998	131834
MEM	106104	55516
UX	119367	62438

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 865 Plus	Snapdragon 768G
Single-Core	1042	777
Multi-Core	3647	2642

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 865 Plus	Snapdragon 768G
Frequency	3100 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz Kryo 585 Prime 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver	1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Gold 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	2750	2133
Memory bandwidth	44	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 865 Plus is 9% better than Snapdragon 768G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 650	Adreno 620
GPU Frequency	645 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	1348	896
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	512	384
Display	3840 x 2160 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	30.9	26.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	75.2	52.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	103.7	56.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	58.1	39.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	64.4	44.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	94.9	72.2
Real Racing 3	129.6	85.1
Sniper 3D	165.9	124.7
Need for Speed No Limits	145.2	102.1
Mortal Kombat X	119.3	82.2
CSR Racing 2	145.2	68

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	25 MP	22 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 480	Qualcomm Spectra 355
Video Encoding FPS	60	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G	Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3000 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GPS, NavIC enabled, GNSS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus is better: 36
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 865 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 865 Plus specs and review.

Snapdragon 768G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 768G specs and review.