|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G |
|
Comparisons 28-02-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Antutu v10, 9, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 7c or Snapdragon 690 5G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 7c | 16% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 24% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 7c | 78% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 7c | 13% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 21% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 7c |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Total score | 222661 | 339723 | CPU | 62334 | 95116 | GPU | 84620 | 129086 | MEM | 35625 | 54361 | UX | 40088 | 61145 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 7c |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Single-Core | 499 | 760 | Multi-Core | 1696 | 2587 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 7c |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.4 GHz Kryo 468 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 7c is 16% better than Snapdragon 690 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619L | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 975 MHz | GFloPS | 452.14 | 486 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 256 | 316 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.5 | 24.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 43.3 | 55.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 48.9 | 45.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.3 | 41.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 37.1 | 45.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 52.4 | 71.4 | Real Racing 3 | 84.2 | 80.3 | Sniper 3D | 105.7 | 59.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 87.5 | 82.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 69.9 | 66.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 57.9 | 59.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 255 | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X15 LTE modem | Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System | Download speed | 600 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 300 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC, QZSS, GLONASS, GPS, Galileo, Beidou, SBAS | GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS, GNSS | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is better: 26 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 7c SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Apple A9 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Snapdragon 690 5G SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
| |
|