|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 9825 |
|
Comparisons 28-02-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 9825, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 or Exynos 9825.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | 29% |
Exynos 9825 | 26% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | 80% |
Exynos 9825 | 72% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | 27% |
Exynos 9825 | 25% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 |
Exynos 9825 | Total score | 403836 | 361112 | CPU | 113064 | 101103 | GPU | 153464 | 137221 | MEM | 64616 | 57779 | UX | 72691 | 65002 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 |
Exynos 9825 | Single-Core | 905 | 778 | Multi-Core | 3076 | 2648 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 |
Exynos 9825 | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 3300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 575 Prime 4x1.5 GHz Kryo 575 Gold | 2x3.4 GHz Exynos M3 Mongoose 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 31.1 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9825 is 27% better than Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G76 MP12 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 986 | 489.38 | # of Cores | | 12 | # of Shader Units | 384 | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.8 | 28.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.4 | 55.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.2 | 45.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.6 | 37.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 36.3 | 46.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 56.4 | 71.3 | Real Racing 3 | 69.4 | 68.1 | Sniper 3D | 105.1 | 72.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 66.7 | 81.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.7 | 72.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 71.8 | 59 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 22 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 355 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 2024 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2900 MBit/s. | 316 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9825 is better: 14 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Exynos 9825 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
| |
|