|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G |
|
Comparisons 25-03-2023 Full testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 or Snapdragon 690 5G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 | 72% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 24% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 | 87% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 | 71% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 21% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Total score | 1004082 | 339723 | CPU | 281140 | 95116 | GPU | 381558 | 129086 | MEM | 160661 | 54361 | UX | 180732 | 61145 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Single-Core | 1400 | 760 | Multi-Core | 4415 | 2587 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Frequency | 2910 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | 10200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2910 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 86 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is 31% better than Snapdragon 690 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 619L | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 975 MHz | GFloPS | 1762.89 | 486 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | 316 | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 37.9 | 24.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 119.1 | 55.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 70.5 | 45.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 65.3 | 41.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 101.3 | 45.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 147.2 | 71.4 | Real Racing 3 | 142.6 | 80.3 | Sniper 3D | 157.6 | 59.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 99.9 | 82.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 102.8 | 66.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 86.8 | 59.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X62 Modem-RF System 5G | Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System | Download speed | 4400 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS, Galileo, GLONASS, GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, SBAS, NavIC, GPS | GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS, GNSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is better: 36
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is better: 2 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 690 5G SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
| |
|