|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917, compare of GPUs Adreno 505 and Adreno 308. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 439 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like 3DMark, PCMark, Octane V2, Neocore, Geekbench, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 439 or Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 439 | 4% |
Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 439 | 62% |
Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 | 28% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 439 | 3% |
Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 439 |
Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 | Total score | 56522 | 37619 | CPU | 15831 | 10533 | GPU | 21481 | 14298 | MEM | 9051 | 6012 | UX | 10165 | 6771 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 439 |
Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 | Single-Core | 146 | 99 | Multi-Core | 658 | 459 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 439 |
Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1400 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 5 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 677 | Memory bandwidth | 6.4 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 128 KB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 439 is 30% better than Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 439 has -4 more core than Snapdragon 425 MSM8917. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 505 | Adreno 308 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 48 | 27 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 48 | 24 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 19.8 | 11.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 48.4 | 30.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 33.9 | 19.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 29.1 | 16.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 40.3 | 25.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 60.5 | 38.7 | Real Racing 3 | 67.8 | 34 | Sniper 3D | 44.1 | 42.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 61 | 27.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 49.2 | 22.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 37.3 | 21.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X6 LTE modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X6 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 75 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 is better: 4 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 439 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 SoC Comparisons • Vs MT6750 • Vs MT6750T • Vs Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MT8321 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|