MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm QCM6490

Comparisons 18-03-2023

Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm QCM6490, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Dimensity 7200 or QCM6490.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 7200

48%

QCM6490

43%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 7200

86%

QCM6490

81%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 7200

47%

QCM6490

40%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 7200	QCM6490
Total score	672473	598126
CPU	188302	167485
GPU	255546	227279
MEM	107598	95708
UX	121048	107652

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 7200	QCM6490
Single-Core	990	929
Multi-Core	3473	3378

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 7200	QCM6490
Frequency	2200 MHz	2700 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions	5200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	4666
Memory bandwidth	48	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM6490 is 18% better than Dimensity 7200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MC4	Adreno 643L
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	812 MHz
GFloPS	1176	1573
# of Cores	4
# of Shader Units		576
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.4	27.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	78.1	67.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	47.6	92.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	43.2	51.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	67.6	57.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	98.4	83.1
Real Racing 3	82.3	185.8
Sniper 3D	90.5	204.7
Need for Speed No Limits	75.8	147.1
Mortal Kombat X	54.4	148.8
CSR Racing 2	66.5	129.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	36 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Modem QCM6490 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C	GBeidou, GLONASS, QZSS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GPS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM6490 is better: 17
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 7200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 7200 specs and review.

QCM6490 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCM6490 specs and review.