|
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Helio G99 |
|
Comparisons 22-09-2023 Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Helio G99, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra or MediaTek Helio G99.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | 51% |
MediaTek Helio G99 | 26% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | 86% |
MediaTek Helio G99 | 70% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | 49% |
MediaTek Helio G99 | 24% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra |
MediaTek Helio G99 | Total score | 719546 | 361581 | CPU | 201463 | 101249 | GPU | 273436 | 137402 | MEM | 115118 | 57851 | UX | 129523 | 65075 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra |
MediaTek Helio G99 | Single-Core | 1059 | 652 | Multi-Core | 3716 | 1982 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra |
MediaTek Helio G99 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 10 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 12 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G57 MC2 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 912 | 486 | # of Cores | 6 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.1 | 28.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 85.5 | 55.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.1 | 46.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 47.1 | 38.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 73.2 | 47.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 106.8 | 72.1 | Real Racing 3 | 103.1 | 69.7 | Sniper 3D | 113.5 | 87.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 62.6 | 64.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 82.1 | 53.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 67.4 | 55.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC | NAVIC, BeiDou B1C + B2a, QZSS L1+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 35
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G99 is better: 5 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
MediaTek Helio G99 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
| |
|