Comparisons 20-05-2022
Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or MediaTek Dimensity 8000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 96% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 96% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 88% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 88% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 92% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | | Total score | 801200 | 777515 | | CPU | 163368 | 163368 | | GPU | 139627 | 139627 | | MEM | 106600 | 106600 | | UX | 93142 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | | Single-Core | 1455 | 1145 | | Multi-Core | 4766 | 4015 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2750 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 5800 millions | 6200 millions | | Core configuration | 2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.75 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 8 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 32 | 48 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB | | L2 cache | 320 KB | 640 KB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is 8% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 MP6 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 600 MHz | | GFloPS | 504 | 912 | | # of Cores | 9 | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
|
