MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000

Comparisons 20-05-2022

Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or MediaTek Dimensity 8000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

96%

MediaTek Dimensity 8000

96%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

88%

MediaTek Dimensity 8000

88%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

92%

MediaTek Dimensity 8000

91%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	MediaTek Dimensity 8000
Total score	801200	777515
CPU	224335	217705
GPU	304453	295455
MEM	128197	124392
UX	144219	139951

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	MediaTek Dimensity 8000
Single-Core	1455	1145
Multi-Core	4766	4015

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	MediaTek Dimensity 8000
Frequency	3000 MHz	2750 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	5800 millions	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.75 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	6400
Memory bandwidth	32	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	320 KB	640 KB
L3 cache	8 MB	16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is 8% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	504	912
# of Cores	9	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	31.1	30.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	94.8	92.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.6	54.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	52.2	51.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	81.5	78.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	117.1	113.7
Real Racing 3	113.7	110.5
Sniper 3D	125.5	121.1
Need for Speed No Limits	79.7	77.1
Mortal Kombat X	82.5	80.8
CSR Racing 2	68.6	66.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5	QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 1300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 8000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8000 specs and review.