|
MediaTek Dimensity 1000C vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek Dimensity 1000C vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, compare of GPUs Adreno 618 and Mali-G57 MP5. This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 1000C is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77) and Snapdragon 732G is octa-core (Kryo 470). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the processors are in games Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1000C or Snapdragon 732G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 1000C | 31% |
Snapdragon 732G | 20% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 1000C | 76% |
Snapdragon 732G | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 1000C | 29% |
Snapdragon 732G | 19% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 1000C |
Snapdragon 732G | Total score | 430976 | 289103 | CPU | 120673 | 80940 | GPU | 163767 | 109849 | MEM | 68953 | 46248 | UX | 77577 | 52047 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 1000C |
Snapdragon 732G | Single-Core | 923 | 636 | Multi-Core | 3047 | 2289 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 1000C |
Snapdragon 732G | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 29.87 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 732G is 13% better than Dimensity 1000C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP5 | Adreno 618 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 705.5 | 452.14 | # of Cores | 5 | | # of Shader Units | | 256 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.1 | 27.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.6 | 47.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 57.3 | 46.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 41.8 | 39.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 46.9 | 37.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 76.6 | 60.4 | Real Racing 3 | 86 | 70.4 | Sniper 3D | 74.5 | 75 | Need for Speed No Limits | 68.8 | 56.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 83.1 | 75 | CSR Racing 2 | 63 | 61 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 22 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 350 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X15 LTE modem | Download speed | 4600 MBit/s. | 800 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000C is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G is better: 8 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 1000C SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
Snapdragon 732G SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|