 |
Intel Core i7-10710U vs Intel Core i5-1038NG7 |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-10710U vs Intel Core i5-1038NG7 and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like MATLAB, WPrime, RealBench, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, 7zip, Prime95, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Furmark, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Blender, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-1038NG7 or Intel Core i7-10710U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-10710U | 53% |
Core i5-1038NG7 | 52% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-10710U is 1% better than Core i5-1038NG7. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-10710U | 53% |
Core i5-1038NG7 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.5 | 92.4 | | Valorant | 106.3 | 105.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.5 | 58.8 | | Apex Legends | 99.9 | 98.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.7 | 78.8 | | Overwatch | 86.1 | 85.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.3 | 72.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.1 | 52.5 | | Warzone | 82.9 | 81.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 89.3 | 88.2 | | Valheim | 88.2 | 87.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-10710U | 230% |
Core i5-1038NG7 | 150% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-10710U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-1038NG7 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 28W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-10710U |
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 178 | 177 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1060 | 781 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 460 | 441 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2364 | 1922 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1052 | 1118 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5939 | 4995 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-10710U |
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | | Single-Core | 2482 | 2470 | | Multi-Core | 10101 | 9613 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-10710U |
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | | Single-Core | 1039 | 1267 | | Multi-Core | 5427 | 4329 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-10710U |
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | | Announcement date | November 07, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1344 | | Core name | Comet Lake | Ice Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 10 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 8 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 28 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 58.3 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1038NG7 is 44% better than Core i7-10710U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-10710U has 2 more core than Core i5-1038NG7. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10710U is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1038NG7 is better: 7
However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-10710U and Intel Core i5-1038NG7 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-10710U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
