 |
Intel Core i3-9350KF vs Intel Core i7-10510Y |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-9350KF vs Intel Core i7-10510Y and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Prime95, Furmark, VeraCrypt, RealBench, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, WPrime, SuperPi, AIDA64, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, PCMark 10, Blender, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10510Y or Intel Core i3-9350KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-9350KF | 52% |
Core i7-10510Y | 51% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-9350KF is 1% better than Core i7-10510Y. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-9350KF | 53% |
Core i7-10510Y | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.5 | 91.0 | | Valorant | 106.2 | 103.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.5 | 57.9 | | Apex Legends | 99.8 | 97.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.7 | 77.5 | | Overwatch | 86.0 | 83.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.3 | 71.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.1 | 51.7 | | Warzone | 82.8 | 80.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 89.2 | 86.8 | | Valheim | 88.2 | 85.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-9350KF | 55% |
Core i7-10510Y | 381% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-10510Y is more energy efficient than the Core i3-9350KF since it has less power consumption: 91W vs. 9W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
Intel Core i7-10510Y | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 182 | 130 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 715 | 655 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 287 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1833 | 2142 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 949 | 1201 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3686 | 3141 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
Intel Core i7-10510Y | | Single-Core | 2757 | 2301 | | Multi-Core | 7376 | 6303 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
Intel Core i7-10510Y | | Single-Core | 1514 | 1029 | | Multi-Core | 5362 | 2904 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-9350KF |
Intel Core i7-10510Y | | Announcement date | March 07, 2019 | October 07, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | UTFCBGA1377 | | Core name | Coffee Lake | Amber Lake Y | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 9 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 1.2 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2400 millions | 6800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 91 W | 9 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 33.33 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-9350KF is 70% better than Core i7-10510Y in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9350KF is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10510Y is better: 7
Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-9350KF and Intel Core i7-10510Y before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-9350KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-10510Y Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
|
|
|
