|
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500, speed examination of GPUs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail). This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom x7-Z8700 is quad-core (SoFIA) and Atom x5-Z8500 is quad-core (SoFIA). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Geekbench, PCMark, 3DMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Atom x7-Z8700 or Atom x5-Z8500 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom x7-Z8700 | 4% |
Atom x5-Z8500 | 5% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom x7-Z8700 | 53% |
Atom x5-Z8500 | 54% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom x7-Z8700 | 2% |
Atom x5-Z8500 | 2% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom x7-Z8700 |
Atom x5-Z8500 | Total score | 69107 | 71836 | CPU | 19342 | 20114 | GPU | 26260 | 27295 | MEM | 11060 | 11495 | UX | 12432 | 12928 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom x7-Z8700 |
Atom x5-Z8500 | Single-Core | 178 | 185 | Multi-Core | 804 | 836 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom x7-Z8700 |
Atom x5-Z8500 | Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1440 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.6-2.4 GHz SoFIA | 4x1.44-2.24 GHz SoFIA | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom x7-Z8700 is 9% better than Atom x5-Z8500 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 179 | 115.2 | # of Cores | 16 | 16 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 15.4 | 16.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 25.3 | 26.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 17.2 | 18.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.3 | 13.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 16.2 | 17.9 | Real Racing 3 | 31.6 | 33 | Sniper 3D | 48.1 | 58.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 45.5 | 31.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 32.9 | 30.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 30.4 | 37 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 21 MBit/s. | 21 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8500 is better: 15 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Atom x7-Z8700 and Atom x5-Z8500, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Atom x7-Z8700 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Atom x5-Z8500 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|