HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

Comparisons   16-01-2024
   Detailed testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Geekbench, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Kirin 8000 or MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 8000

30%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 8000

86%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 8000

27%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 8000	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Total score	659883	719546
CPU	184769	201463
GPU	250747	273436
MEM	105574	115118
UX	118769	129523

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 8000	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Single-Core	945	1059
Multi-Core	3611	3716

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 8000	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Frequency	2200 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		6200 millions
Core configuration	1x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	6400
Memory bandwidth	44	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		128 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Maleoon 910	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	750 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	2056	912
# of Cores	4	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	30.6	28.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	74.9	85.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	103.6	51.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	57.7	47.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	64.6	73.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	94.6	106.8
Real Racing 3	128.5	103.1
Sniper 3D	165.8	113.5
Need for Speed No Limits	144.2	62.6
Mortal Kombat X	118.7	82.1
CSR Racing 2	144.5	67.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	128 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Balong 5G	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	14000 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 8000 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 21
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 8000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 8000 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.