|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Intel Core i9-10900K |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Intel Core i9-10900K and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Gears 5, AIDA64, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, PassMark, PCMark 10, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900K or AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 66% |
Core i9-10900K | 57% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 13% better than Core i9-10900K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 64% |
Core i9-10900K | 58% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.6 | 102.7 | Valorant | 129.1 | 116.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.3 | 65.3 | Apex Legends | 121.3 | 109.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.8 | 87.5 | Overwatch | 104.5 | 94.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89.1 | 80.5 | DOOM Eternal | 64.5 | 58.3 | Warzone | 100.7 | 91.0 | Assassin's Creed | 108.4 | 98.0 | Valheim | 107.1 | 96.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 15% |
Core i9-10900K | 43% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900K is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
Intel Core i9-10900K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 209 | 234 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5933 | 2677 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 509 | 539 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 13552 | 6399 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1270 | 1418 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 34255 | 17325 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
Intel Core i9-10900K | Single-Core | 2663 | 3141 | Multi-Core | 54830 | 24010 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
Intel Core i9-10900K | Single-Core | 1306 | 1617 | Multi-Core | 25072 | 14374 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
Intel Core i9-10900K | Announcement date | November 25, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | sTRX4 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Castle Peak | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Cores | 24 | 10 | Threads | 48 | 20 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 125 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 1.5MB | | L2 cache | 12MB | | L3 cache | 128MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000010 100-100000010WOF
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2% better than Core i9-10900K in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 14 more core than Core i9-10900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900K is better: 13 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Intel Core i9-10900K before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Intel Core i9-10900K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|