MediaTek MT8168 is a mid-range chipset designed for mobile devices such as tablets and phones, date of announcement 2020. The chip created by a 12 nm process. The processor has a quad-core configuration divided into blocks. The first ARM Cortex-A53 is the fastest with four cores running at 2.0 GHz. The chip supports 64-bit data. Mali-G52 MP1 GPU is responsible for working with graphical data. Gadgets that have the MT8168 can work in 4G networks. Modem allows you to download and send data at a speed 300 MBit/s and 100 MBit/s. You can find out whether MT8168 chip is good or bad from comparisons with other processors and testing results.MediaTek MT8168 specifications General Info Brand MediaTek Name MT8168 Model Cortex-A53 Release date 2020 CPU configuration 4x2.0GHz ARM Cortex-A53 Instruction set architecture ARMv8-A Frequency 2000 MHz Cores 4 Word Size 64 bit Process 12 nm Transistor count ? Technologies MiraVision, ClearMotion Power consumption (TDP) 5 W L1 cache 32 KB L2 cache 1 MB L3 cache 1 MB
Graphics GPU Mali-G52 MP1 Frequency 800 MHz Cores 1 Process 12 nm
Memory Type LPDDR3, DDR3L, DDR4, LPDDR4, LPDDR4x Frequency 800 MHz Max volume 4 Gb Internal type eMMC 5.1 Memory bandwidth 14 GB/s Memory bus 2x 16 Bit
Connectivity Download speed 300 MBit/s Upload speed 100 MBit/s LTE Cat Cat-7 Wi-Fi ranges b/g/n Location GPS,Galileo,Glonass,Beidou Wi-Fi ver. 5 Bluetooth ver. 5
Cameras Main camera max resolution 13 MPix Codecs 1920 x 1080, max FPS 30. Codec: H.264
Display and Audio Maximum Display resolution 2400 x 1080 pix Video encoding Resolution FullHD, max FPS 30. Codec: H.264
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu v10 • 3DMark • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile MediaTek MT8168 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 MediaTek MT8168 review VIDEO