MediaTek Helio P18 mid-range chipset designed for installation in mobile gadgets such as tablets and phones, released in 2017. The CPU produced by a 28 nm process. The processor has a eight cores divided into clusters. The first cluster ARM Cortex-A53 is the most high-performance with eight cores running at 2.0 GHz. The chipset supports 64-bit data. Mali-T860 MP2 GPU works with graphical data. Gadgets that have the Helio P18 installed can work in 4G networks. Modem allows you to download and upload data at a speed 300 MBit/s and 50 MBit/s. To understand Helio P18 SoC is good or bad by looking at benchmark results and comparisons with other processors.MediaTek Helio P18 specifications General Info Brand MediaTek Name Helio P18 Model MT6755S Release date 2017 CPU configuration 8x2.0GHz ARM Cortex-A53 Instruction set architecture ARMv8-A Frequency 2000 MHz Cores 8 Word Size 64 bit Process 28 nm Transistor count ? Technologies MiraVision, CorePilot, SmartScreen, BluLight Defender, Adaptive Picture Quality, UltraDimming Power consumption (TDP) 4 W L1 cache 32 KB L2 cache 1 MB L3 cache 1 MB
Graphics GPU Mali-T860 MP2 Frequency 800 MHz Cores 2 Process 28 nm
Memory Type LPDDR3 (Single Channel) Frequency 933 MHz Max volume 4 Gb Internal type eMMC 5.1 Memory bandwidth 13 GB/s Memory bus 2x 16 Bit
Connectivity Download speed 300 MBit/s Upload speed 50 MBit/s LTE Cat Cat-6 Wi-Fi ranges 4 a/b/g/n Location GPS,Galileo,Glonass,Beidou Wi-Fi ver. 5 Bluetooth ver. 5
Cameras Main camera max resolution 21 MPix Second camera max resolution 16 and 8 MPix Codecs 1920 x 1080, max FPS 30. Codec: H.264 Technologies Demosaic and Enhanced sharpness, TrueBridge ISP, Dual ISP with advanced 3A, Denoise
Display and Audio Maximum Display resolution 1920 x 1080 pix Video encoding Resolution FullHD, max FPS 30. Codec: H.264
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu v10 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile • 3DMark MediaTek Helio P18 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 MediaTek Helio P18 review VIDEO