Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus

Comparisons   03-12-2021
   Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Unisoc Tiger T616 or Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus.

 
Unisoc Tiger T616
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Unisoc Tiger T61611% Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus8%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Unisoc Tiger T61668% Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus56%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Unisoc Tiger T6168% Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus6%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Unisoc Tiger T616 Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
Total score154594113847
CPU4328531874
GPU5875443265
MEM2473918217
UX2782920499

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Unisoc Tiger T616 Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
Single-Core264232
Multi-Core15081024

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Unisoc Tiger T616 Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
Frequency2000 MHz2200 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4x2.2 GHz Kryo 280
Power consumption (TDP)9 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency18661866
Memory bandwidth3229.8
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.1-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is 9% better than Unisoc Tiger T616 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Unisoc Tiger T616 has -4 more core than Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 512
GPU Frequency750 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS383.69255
# of Cores1
# of Shader Units128
Display2160 x 1080 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile22.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)29.543.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra45.446.5
Call of Duty: Mobile39.324.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)28.239.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition39.957.8
Real Racing 356.758.1
Sniper 3D72.274.4
Need for Speed No Limits72.265.1
Mortal Kombat X72.674.4
CSR Racing 259.751.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution64 MP24 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 160
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T616 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is better: 15
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Unisoc Tiger T616 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Unisoc Tiger T616 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Snapdragon 662
• Vs Snapdragon 710
• Vs Helio G70
• Vs Exynos 880
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands