|
Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Qualcomm QCS4290 |
|
Comparisons 18-02-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Qualcomm QCS4290, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy QCS6490 or QCS4290.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCS6490 |
QCS4290 | Total score | 592145 | 175559 | CPU | 165802 | 49149 | GPU | 225011 | 66709 | MEM | 94749 | 28099 | UX | 106579 | 31609 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCS6490 |
QCS4290 | Single-Core | 920 | 359 | Multi-Core | 3344 | 1511 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCS6490 |
QCS4290 | Frequency | 2700 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | 5200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1866/933 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS6490 is 25% better than QCS4290 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 643L | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 812 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 1573 | 312 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 576 | 192 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 900 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.4 | 23.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 67.5 | 27.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 92.6 | 58.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 51.5 | 30.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 57.8 | 24.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 84.9 | 33.8 | Real Racing 3 | 115.8 | 73.3 | Sniper 3D | 148.5 | 93.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 129.7 | 82.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 120.8 | 93.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 120.9 | 82.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 192 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | Triple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Modem QCM6490 5G | Qualcomm QCM4290 LTE modem | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 410 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 170 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo | SBAS, Beidou, GPS, Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, GNSS, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 41
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS4290 is better: 0 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCS6490 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
QCS4290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Apple A9 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
| |
|