![MediaTek MT8766 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300 benchmark which processor is better MediaTek MT8766 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300 benchmark which processor is better](/imgs/subhead.png) |
MediaTek MT8766 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300 |
|
Comparisons 22-05-2022 Full comparison data of MediaTek MT8766 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MediaTek MT8766 or Atom x5-Z8300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek MT8766 | 5% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek MT8766 | 34% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 54% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek MT8766 | 2% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek MT8766 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | Total score | 79439 | 62268 | CPU | 22235 | 17437 | GPU | 30194 | 23658 | MEM | 12719 | 9967 | UX | 14290 | 11201 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek MT8766 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | Single-Core | 208 | 161 | Multi-Core | 971 | 725 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek MT8766 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1440 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.44-1.84 GHz SoFIA | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek MT8766 is 28% better than Atom x5-Z8300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 96 | # of Cores | 2 | 16 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.3 | 13.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.9 | 22.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 16.8 | 14.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.4 | 10.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 15.2 | 14.9 | Real Racing 3 | 41.7 | 40.1 | Sniper 3D | 35.2 | 36.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 32.1 | 41.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 43.3 | 36.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.1 | 29.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 20 MP | 13 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | A-GOLD 620 | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 21 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8766 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is better: 10 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek MT8766 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
Atom x5-Z8300 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|