|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus |
|
Comparisons 08-06-2023 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Dimensity 9200 Plus or Snapdragon 888 Plus.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 9200 Plus | 99% |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | 64% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 9200 Plus | 86% |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | 80% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 9200 Plus | 97% |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | 62% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 9200 Plus |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | Total score | 1384198 | 897046 | CPU | 387571 | 251179 | GPU | 526003 | 340878 | MEM | 221468 | 143532 | UX | 249146 | 161476 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 9200 Plus |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | Single-Core | 1583 | 1250 | Multi-Core | 5754 | 3945 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 9200 Plus |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | Frequency | 3350 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 8553 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 64 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9200 Plus is 10% better than Snapdragon 888 Plus in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Immortalis-G715 MC16 | Adreno 660 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 3200 | 1486 | # of Cores | 16 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 52.6 | 33.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 164.9 | 106.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 98.6 | 62.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 91.2 | 58.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 140.1 | 90.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 201.9 | 131.1 | Real Racing 3 | 197.4 | 127.2 | Sniper 3D | 215.7 | 140.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 137.7 | 89.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 142.3 | 91.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 118.6 | 77.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3100 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 6 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Snapdragon 888 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|