HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 710F vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G71 MP20 and Mali-G71 MP4.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, Octane V2, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, and how good the CPUs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Kirin 710F or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 710F

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

12%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 710F

62%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 710F

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Total score	132067	176074
CPU	36974	49309
GPU	50180	66905
MEM	21140	28174
UX	23762	31689

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Single-Core	270	488
Multi-Core	1188	1515

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Frequency	2200 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	6 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	1866
Memory bandwidth		29
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is 4% better than Kirin 710F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP4	Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	546 MHz
GFloPS	169	371.2
# of Cores	4	20
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	24.8	23.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	48.1	27.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	60.7	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	27.4	30.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	42.8	24.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	62.4	33.5
Real Racing 3	75.9	73.5
Sniper 3D	115.3	94.1
Need for Speed No Limits	97.1	82.3
Mortal Kombat X	78.9	94.1
CSR Racing 2	85	82.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	28 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP	28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 22
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710F specs and review.

Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 9 Octa 8895 specs and review.