 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7262 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7262 and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Prime95, PassMark, SuperPi, Furmark, WPrime, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Handbrake, 7zip, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7262 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 62% |
EPYC 7262 | 56% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6434H is 9% better than EPYC 7262. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434H | 64% |
EPYC 7262 | 57% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.1 | 101.4 | | Valorant | 128.5 | 115.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 64.5 | | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 108.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 86.4 | | Overwatch | 104.1 | 93.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.6 | 79.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 57.6 | | Warzone | 100.2 | 89.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.9 | 96.8 | | Valheim | 106.6 | 95.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 27% |
EPYC 7262 | 22% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7262 as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 886 | 199 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2879 | 1922 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1976 | 398 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7114 | 4212 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1374 | 1148 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40535 | 11721 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Single-Core | 12581 | 1915 | | Multi-Core | 41263 | 21190 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Single-Core | 1615 | 1037 | | Multi-Core | 24562 | 13124 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Announcement date | March 11, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 42000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 155 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000041
100-100000041WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 13% better than EPYC 7262 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7262 is better: 3
However, it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and AMD EPYC 7262 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7262 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
