![Intel Core i7-8700B vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 gaming benchmark Intel Core i7-8700B vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 gaming benchmark](/imgs/subhead.png) |
Intel Core i7-8700B vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-8700B vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, Furmark, Prime95, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Handbrake, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, MATLAB, AIDA64. And how good the processors are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 or Intel Core i7-8700B.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8700B | 53% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | 54% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is 1% better than Core i7-8700B. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8700B | 53% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.7 | 94.0 | Valorant | 107.6 | 106.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.3 | 59.8 | Apex Legends | 101.2 | 100.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.7 | 80.1 | Overwatch | 87.2 | 86.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.3 | 73.7 | DOOM Eternal | 53.8 | 53.4 | Warzone | 84.0 | 83.3 | Assassin's Creed | 90.4 | 89.7 | Valheim | 89.3 | 88.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8700B | 59% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | 54% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8700B is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8700B |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 202 | 172 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1202 | 1347 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 478 | 442 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2701 | 2976 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1146 | 1145 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 7969 | 7928 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8700B |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Single-Core | 2680 | 2281 | Multi-Core | 12510 | 13702 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8700B |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Single-Core | 1162 | 1059 | Multi-Core | 6587 | 5863 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8700B |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Announcement date | July 07, 2018 | April 01, 2018 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | AM4 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Pinnacle Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 8 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 3600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2933 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 576KB | L2 cache | | 3MB | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD260BBBM6IAF YD260BBBAFMPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is 5% better than Core i7-8700B in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8700B is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is better: 10 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-8700B and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8700B Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
| |
|