 |
Intel Core i7-7820EQ vs Intel Core i7-8565UC |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-7820EQ vs Intel Core i7-8565UC tests and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Prime95, WPrime, PassMark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Furmark, PCMark 10, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Blender.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-8565UC or Intel Core i7-7820EQ.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-7820EQ | 52% |
Core i7-8565UC | 51% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-7820EQ is 1% better than Core i7-8565UC. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-7820EQ | 52% |
Core i7-8565UC | 52% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.1 | 91.7 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 104.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 58.4 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 97.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 78.1 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 84.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 71.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.3 | 52.1 | | Warzone | 81.6 | 81.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.9 | 87.5 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 86.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-7820EQ | 71% |
Core i7-8565UC | 260% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8565UC is more energy efficient than the Core i7-7820EQ since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i7-8565UC | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 140 | 128 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 704 | 645 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 359 | 283 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1758 | 2109 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 955 | 1182 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4563 | 3092 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i7-8565UC | | Single-Core | 2242 | 2501 | | Multi-Core | 7037 | 6205 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i7-8565UC | | Single-Core | 961 | 1170 | | Multi-Core | 4012 | 3621 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i7-8565UC | | Announcement date | March 07, 2017 | November 07, 2018 | | Type | Embedded | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1528 | | Core name | Kaby Lake | Whiskey Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 7 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 1.8 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 1900 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-7820EQ is 40% better than Core i7-8565UC in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-7820EQ is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8565UC is better: 10
Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-7820EQ and Intel Core i7-8565UC before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-7820EQ Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8350K
Intel Core i7-8565UC Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
|
|
|
