 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Extreme benchmark examination data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G57 MP5.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 850 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 435496 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 10212 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 705.5 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 547 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 9.07 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz is better: 0
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
