 |
AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 7702 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 7702 and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, AIDA64, Blender, MATLAB, 7zip, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, PassMark, WPrime, Furmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7702 or AMD EPYC 9454P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9454P | 73% |
EPYC 7702 | 71% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 2% better than EPYC 7702. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9454P | 80% |
EPYC 7702 | 81% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.3 | 143.1 | | Valorant | 161.7 | 162.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.6 | 91.0 | | Apex Legends | 152.0 | 152.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.3 | 121.9 | | Overwatch | 131.0 | 131.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.6 | 112.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.9 | 81.3 | | Warzone | 126.2 | 126.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.9 | 136.6 | | Valheim | 134.2 | 134.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9454P | 17% |
EPYC 7702 | 17% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 216 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9744 | 8896 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 421 | 406 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 20676 | 18857 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1073 | 996 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 53807 | 49035 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Single-Core | 2439 | 2099 | | Multi-Core | 78937 | 71929 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Single-Core | 1540 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 53258 | 53995 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | | Core name | Genoa | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 64 | | Threads | 96 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000873
100-000000873WOF | 100-000000038
100-100000038WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9454P is 27% better than EPYC 7702 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7702 has 16 more core than EPYC 9454P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702 is better: 18
All the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 7702 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7702 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
